![]() OTOH, a lot of Nikon scanner users report good cleaning with Vuescan, on par with their OEM software with ICE, so Not blend in the repaired areas anywhere near as seamlessly. My experience comparing a Minolta scanner with ICE: Vuescan cleaning is not as good, misses a lot more and does Registered but still can be used to compare. Vuescan can be downloaded for free and will watermark the output until ![]() Also, I understand that the ICE algorithm is provided by the Nikonscan software, and is not part of the Coolscan V itself, but I'm sure there's no simple answer, but your inputs would be muchĪppreciated. I would be interested in people's experience of both. (Silverfast is not an option I'm considering - from what I read in the fora, my conclusion is that the premium for Silverfast is not worth it, at I know that there are challenges with Kodachrome, and that forī&W, the IR based dust removal technique doesn't apply.įor dust and scratch removal I'm trying to understand the relative merits of using the Nikonscan's ICE feature or Vuescan's dust removal. ![]() The most data with scratches and dust removed and nothing else done. I will use either Aperture or Photoshop to make adjustments. I want to do the minimum processing at scan time. I'm reading everything I can to try and do this optimally and avoid rework if possible. ![]() ![]() I'm just about to start scanning a large number of slides (including Kodachrome) and negatives (colour and B&W) with a Coolscan V, and ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |